AI Agents Are Racing to Make Quantum-Safe Bitcoin Cheap—And Winning

An open contest run by StarkWare, Yukon Research, and Eigen Labs cut the estimated GPU cost to produce a quantum-safe Bitcoin transaction from about $320 to roughly $67 in one week by optimizing the client-side brute-force search. The fastest entrants used AI-assisted development, with Anthropic's Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 topping the leaderboards and other models like OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra, Grok 4.6, and Kimi also contributing significant improvements.

By AI Newsroom· Reviewed by Pranav, Founder & Editor-in-ChiefPublished about 2 hours agoUpdated about 2 hours ago0 views
AI Agents Are Racing to Make Quantum-Safe Bitcoin Cheap—And Winning

Why It Matters

The competition shows how software and machine-learning optimization can rapidly reduce the computational expense of a stopgap quantum-resistant transaction method, highlighting both the short-term practicality of such constructions and the broader urgency around Bitcoin's vulnerability to future quantum attacks.

Key Facts

  • Organizers: StarkWare, Yukon Research, and Eigen Labs
  • Estimated cost reduction: From about $320 to roughly $67 in GPU compute
  • Initial mainnet transaction compute: ~3,100 GPU-hours, costing around $320
  • Brute-force difficulty: Only about 1 in 70 trillion hash outputs fits the required shape
  • Performance improvement: Benchmark rose from 146 million to over 820 million verified candidates/sec on an RTX 4090

An open optimization contest run by StarkWare together with Yukon Research and Eigen Labs drove a steep fall in the estimated GPU compute needed to craft a quantum-resistant Bitcoin transaction. Contest dashboard figures show an estimated cost drop from roughly $320 to about $67 over the course of a week, achieved by making the client-side brute-force hashing routine far faster.

The quantum-safe construction was first used on mainnet last month in a transaction developed by StarkWare; that initial build required around 3,100 GPU-hours and was estimated to cost about $320. The expensive phase of creating these transactions is a pre-blockchain brute-force search performed on the user's GPU: the scheme places a hash where Bitcoin normally expects a signature, and because suitable hashes are extremely rare—about one in 70 trillion—clients must hash inputs repeatedly until they find a fitting output.

Contest entrants focused on accelerating that hashing/search stage. StarkWare reported that a core benchmark increased from 146 million verified candidate hashes per second to more than 820 million per second on a standard RTX 4090, with 62 improvements promoted across two competition tracks. Leading submissions were produced with assistance from AI models; StarkWare named Anthropic's Opus 5 and Fable 5.1 as top performers, followed by OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra, Grok 4.6, and Kimi.

StarkWare cautioned that the roughly $67 figure is an estimate based on stated hardware assumptions and that it changes as better solvers appear. The company also emphasized these optimizations do not make Bitcoin inherently quantum-safe: the transactions created are nonstandard and must be relayed directly to miners, and the construction only protects coins whose public keys have not already been revealed. StarkWare continues to view a soft fork as a preferable long-term solution to quantum risk. The work arrives amid growing industry attention to the threat of quantum computers to elliptic-curve cryptography and related custody planning by firms such as Coinbase.

Keep Reading