California governor vetoes bill banning use of ‘pervert glasses’ to secretly record people
California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed Senate Bill 1130, legislation that would have criminalized secretly recording people in public with wearable devices such as internet-connected glasses. In a letter to lawmakers, Newsom said the bill's definition of wearable recording devices was overly broad and risked creating confusion and unintended consequences, and he noted protections in the proposal already exist under California law.

Why It Matters
The bill targeted a growing category of always-on wearables that include cameras and microphones — devices that privacy advocates and some consumers say have been used to harass people. Newsom's veto leaves regulation of those devices at the state level unresolved while the market for such products continues to expand.
Key Facts
- Action: Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed California Senate Bill 1130
- Reason given: Bill's definition of wearable recording devices was 'too broadly or imprecisely' drawn; overlaps with existing law
- Bill purpose: Would have made it unlawful to secretly record people in public with wearable devices
- Potential penalties: Fines or prison time for violators; fines for noncompliant device makers (as proposed)
- Author of bill: California state senator Eloise Gómez Reyes
California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed Senate Bill 1130, a measure that would have prohibited secretly recording people in public with wearable devices that include cameras and microphones. In a letter to lawmakers announcing his decision, Newsom said the bill's definition of such devices was too broad or imprecise and could cause confusion and unintended consequences. He also noted the proposal contained protections that already exist in state law.
The draft legislation sought to make California the first U.S. state to regulate smart glasses and other always-listening wearables, and would have imposed fines or possible prison sentences on people who recorded others without consent, as well as fines on device makers that failed to comply. Proponents framed the bill as a response to the rapid rollout of internet-connected glasses and similar products; critics and some consumers have used nicknames like "pervert glasses" after reports of misuse.
Manufacturers have been expanding offerings in the space: the article cites that Meta sold more than 7 million wearable glasses last year, and other hardware such as AI-enabled pendants have entered the market. Meanwhile, major tech companies continue to add always-listening features to wearables — the article notes Apple recently announced a watch software feature that can replay a 15-second transcript and summarize conversations from the day.
Senator Eloise Gómez Reyes, who authored the bill, told ABC News the legislation was intended to help California keep pace with the rapid deployment of always-listening technologies. With the governor's veto, California lawmakers would need to revisit the proposal if they want to pursue new limits or clearer definitions for wearable recording devices.
Keep Reading

World’s first enhanced geothermal power plant completed in just 23 months

Musk’s AI chatbot Grok reportedly encouraged Trump to capture Venezuela’s president
