Circle Urges EU to Replace Stablecoin Bank-Deposit Mandates
Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, has urged EU policymakers to abandon proposed requirements that stablecoins be backed by bank deposits. The company also advocated keeping cross-border co-issuance arrangements and establishing a recognition pathway for non-EU stablecoins, while central banks are pushing for stricter protections.

Why It Matters
Changes to the EU's stablecoin rules could reshape how major issuers structure reserves and cross-border operations, affecting market access for foreign stablecoins and the regulatory trade-off between innovation and financial safeguards.
Key Facts
- Company: Circle (USDC issuer)
- Policy asks: Replace bank-deposit backing mandates; preserve cross-border co-issuance; create recognition route for foreign stablecoins
- Counterparty position: Central banks seek stronger safeguards for stablecoins
Circle, the issuer behind the USDC stablecoin, has publicly urged European Union legislators to reconsider proposals that would require stablecoin reserves to be held as bank deposits. In its submission, Circle argued for alternative reserve compositions and pushed to retain the ability for stablecoins to be co-issued across borders, a structure that allows multiple entities in different jurisdictions to jointly issue the same token.
Alongside preserving cross-border co-issuance, Circle proposed the creation of a formal recognition route for stablecoins issued outside the EU. That pathway would let foreign-backed stablecoins operate in EU markets without being forced into local-only issuance models, according to Circle’s recommendations.
Those industry requests face resistance from central banks, which have been demanding tougher safeguards for stablecoins amid concerns about financial stability and consumer protection. Regulators and central bankers want stronger controls on reserve management, transparency, and operational resilience, reflecting a cautious approach to integrating privately issued stablecoins into the broader financial system.
The debate in Brussels highlights a broader policy trade-off: enabling cross-border digital-asset innovation and market access for established global issuers versus enforcing strict reserve and custody rules to limit systemic and consumer risks. How EU legislators balance those priorities will determine the compliance and operational strategies of major stablecoin issuers seeking access to European markets.
Keep Reading

Circle Pushes Back on MiCA's Bank-Deposit Mandate for Stablecoins

ICBA Sues OCC Over Crypto Trust Charters

Ethereum Now Lets You Pay for AI Without Revealing Who You Are
