Collins: Trump’s proposed $5K dividend ‘extraordinarily costly’
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) criticized President Trump’s proposal to give $5,000 to every American adult if Republicans win the midterm elections, calling the plan "extraordinarily costly." She also questioned the wisdom of distributing the payment to all adults regardless of financial need and noted limited details about the proposal so far.

Why It Matters
The plan ties a large, universal cash payment to an electoral outcome and — if implemented without income limits — could have significant budgetary implications and raise questions about whether taxpayer funds should be distributed universally rather than targeted to those in need.
Key Facts
- Senator: Susan Collins (R-Maine)
- Proposal: $5,000 to every American adult if Republicans win the midterm elections
- Senator's assessment: Called the proposal "extraordinarily costly"
- Income cap: Collins said the few details available suggest the plan would not have an income cap
- Details available: Few specifics have been released about how the payment would be structured
Sen. Susan Collins pushed back on President Trump’s public proposal to send $5,000 to every American adult contingent on a Republican midterm victory, describing the idea as "extraordinarily costly." The Maine Republican questioned the policy on fiscal grounds and on whether blanket payments to all adults are appropriate. Collins noted that only a small amount of information about the plan has been released so far, and from that limited material it appears the proposal would not include an income cap. She raised concerns about providing the same payment to people regardless of their financial circumstances. Her remarks framed the proposal as both a budgetary and a policy problem: large universal disbursements can carry substantial costs, and delivering funds without targeting may direct public money to recipients who do not need assistance. With few operational details available, Collins and other lawmakers are left to assess the idea primarily on broad principles of cost and fairness. The proposal’s linkage to the midterm election outcome has made it a focal point for debate among Republicans and lawmakers weighing what types of economic measures should be advanced and how they would be financed if pursued.
Keep Reading

Joe diGenova resigns from DOJ position investigating Trump foes

Why Trump is leaning into his role as ‘builder-in-chief’

Former presidents reflect on 9/11: ‘We can’t erase the nightmare’
