Democrats 'chose visceral hatred for' Donald Trump over crypto Clarity Act, Lummis says
Senator Cynthia Lummis said Democrats prioritized opposition to President Donald Trump over passing bipartisan crypto market-structure legislation, speaking at CoinDesk's Policy & Regulation event after the Senate failed to advance a procedural vote on the Clarity Act. The bill, which sought to clarify SEC and CFTC oversight of crypto markets, did not advance after every Democrat and three Republicans voted against the procedural motion last week.

Why It Matters
The dispute highlights how partisan dynamics tied to President Trump's crypto ties complicated efforts to pass a bill aimed at setting regulatory boundaries for spot and other crypto markets. With lawmakers in both chambers saying statutory clarity remains necessary, the defeat raises questions about how and when a bipartisan compromise might be reached.
Key Facts
- Event: CoinDesk Policy & Regulation event, Sept. 22, 2026
- Speaker: Senator Cynthia Lummis (R)
- Legislation: Clarity Act (crypto market structure bill)
- Senate vote outcome: Procedural vote failed last Tuesday after every Democrat and three Republicans voted against it; a fourth Republican, Sen. Thom Tillis, switched to 'no' at the last minute for procedural reasons
- Bill revisions: Grew from ~300 pages to over 600 pages after Democrats requested additional provisions, including bankruptcy protections
Senator Cynthia Lummis said she was "dismayed, dumbfounded and saddened" that the Senate failed to advance a key procedural vote for the Clarity Act, a bipartisan market-structure bill intended to delineate how the SEC and CFTC should oversee crypto markets. Speaking at CoinDesk's Policy & Regulation conference on Sept. 22, 2026, Lummis attributed the bill's collapse to Democratic opposition she characterized as driven by animus toward President Donald Trump. Lummis said every Democrat voted against the procedural motion and urged the crypto industry to "pin it on the Democrats," arguing that the bill had been the product of cross-party negotiations and expanded from roughly 300 pages to over 600 after Democrats requested additions such as bankruptcy protections. She also named Senators Angela Alsobrooks and Kirsten Gillibrand as "honest brokers" in the negotiations. The Senate's procedural defeat followed a vote in which three Republicans joined the Democrats in opposition; Sen. Thom Tillis changed his vote to "no" at the last minute for procedural reasons. The Clarity Act aimed to provide statutory clarity on issues including oversight of spot markets and the application of securities laws to crypto activities. Members of the House Financial Services Committee and other lawmakers reacted the same day, saying that statutory clarity for crypto remains necessary despite the setback. Chairman French Hill and Rep. Ritchie Torres both argued the Clarity Act or a successor bill is still needed to establish legal certainty. Torres and Hill also said political fallout from President Trump's memecoin and his disclosed crypto gains complicated Democratic support; Trump reported $1.4 billion in crypto-related earnings for 2025 in a mid-year financial disclosure. Hill noted that a similar stablecoin-focused bill, the GENIUS Act, had advanced on a bipartisan basis previously, and suggested more bipartisan work will be required after the midterm elections.
Keep Reading

Crypto market structure can't wait for shot at post-election Clarity Act surge: White House

CME Expands Crypto Futures Lineup With Bitcoin Cash and Uniswap

$161 Million in Decade-Old Bitcoin Has Moved in Just Two Weeks
