Is the Sudanese army gaining momentum against the RSF?
Sudan's armed forces said they captured the town of al-Mazroub in North Kordofan after heavy fighting, claiming the move severs a key RSF link between North and West Kordofan. The SAF also reported strikes in Blue Nile state that it said inflicted heavy losses on the Rapid Support Forces and allied SPLM-N units, while the RSF has not publicly responded to either claim.

Why It Matters
If sustained, these advances could constrain the RSF's movement and supply lines in central Sudan and shift the local balance of power in Kordofan, a region that has become a major battleground in the multi-year conflict. The humanitarian crisis could worsen as front lines shift and displacement increases in the area.
Key Facts
- Town captured: al-Mazroub (North Kordofan)
- Who reported capture: Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) / Mohamed Deidan, special forces spokesman
- Claimed strategic effect: Cuts RSF supply link between North Kordofan and West Kordofan
- Additional SAF claim: Delivered a 'knockout blow' to RSF and SPLM-N in Blue Nile (Minza and Bashkarkad areas)
- RSF response: No immediate comment reported
Sudan's army announced it had seized the town of al-Mazroub in North Kordofan after intense clashes, describing the capture as part of a sequence of recent gains in the region. Army spokesman Mohamed Deidan said holding al-Mazroub severs an important link used by the Rapid Support Forces to move fighters and supplies between North and West Kordofan, and called the advance a turning point for fighting in Kordofan.
The SAF also reported operations in Blue Nile state over the weekend, where its Fourth Infantry Division said coordinated attacks on RSF and allied Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) positions in Minza and Bashkarkad inflicted heavy losses on personnel and equipment and disrupted attempted advances. Blue Nile’s governor separately said RSF-launched drones targeted his residence but were intercepted; neither the RSF nor SPLM-N provided an immediate public response to these government claims.
Control on the ground remains divided. The SAF holds Khartoum and much of Sudan’s north, east and centre, while the RSF dominates much of western Sudan — including nearly all of Darfur — and parts of Kordofan. South Kordofan continues to be contested, with SPLM-N holding pockets in the south. Analysts note that Kordofan has become one of the war’s main flashpoints: about 19.7% of recorded attacks have occurred there, second only to Khartoum, and displacement from the region has risen sharply.
The fighting has compounded an already severe humanitarian emergency. The UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification reported roughly 19.5 million people facing acute hunger and warned of famine risk in multiple areas. Aid monitors project hundreds of thousands of children at risk of severe acute malnutrition, and economic measures such as the sharp depreciation of the Sudanese pound in army-controlled areas have driven up the cost of basic goods for many families.
While the SAF frames recent advances as weakening RSF lines and limiting its mobility, the wider war — now in its fourth year and affecting most of the country — remains unresolved. The RSF continues to control large swathes of western Sudan, and shifting front lines mean the humanitarian and security situation could change rapidly.
Keep Reading

LePage breaks with Trump on Iran, Canada tariffs, immigration in Maine House debate

Flydubai: What happens when a plane plunges 17,000 feet?

Brazil elections live: Lula faces Bolsonaro in close presidential race
