Israel election double standard: Arab leader forced out, far right cleared
Sami Abu Shehadeh, leader of the Palestinian nationalist Balad party, withdrew his candidacy for Israel’s October 27 election after the country’s Supreme Court signalled he could be disqualified over an article he wrote about the Gaza war. Critics say the move highlights a wider pattern in which Arab politicians face ballot challenges while far-right Israeli figures with incendiary rhetoric, including ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, remain on the ballot.

Why It Matters
The episode raises questions about equal political participation for Palestinian citizens of Israel and the application of legal standards under Section 7A of Israel’s Basic Law on the Knesset, after the central elections committee barred Arab lists and candidates while allowing far-right parties to run.
Key Facts
- Candidate withdrawn: Sami Abu Shehadeh (Balad)
- Election date: October 27
- Initial bans by Central Elections Committee: Abu Shehadeh, Ofer Cassif, the Joint List and Ra'am
- Supreme Court rulings: Overturned bans on Joint List, Ra'am and Ofer Cassif; advised Abu Shehadeh could be disqualified
- Attorney General: Gali Baharav-Miara backed Abu Shehadeh's disqualification and found insufficient legal basis to bar far-right parties
Sami Abu Shehadeh, a historian from Jaffa and leader of the Palestinian nationalist Balad party, withdrew his bid to run in Israel’s upcoming election after the Supreme Court indicated he might be disqualified over wording in an article he published on October 8, 2023. The central elections committee had already voted to bar him, alongside Hadash politician Ofer Cassif and the two main Arab-majority lists, the Joint List and Ra'am. The Supreme Court later overturned the bans on the two lists and Cassif, but signalled Abu Shehadeh could still be removed, prompting his withdrawal.
Abu Shehadeh told the court he did not support armed struggle and said a paragraph in the article was poorly phrased; Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara interpreted the wording as potentially amounting to support for armed action. His legal team, Adalah, described the withdrawal as a major setback for the political rights of Palestinian citizens of Israel and accused the process of aiming to delegitimise Arab representatives.
Critics and rights groups have pointed to a wider pattern they characterise as double standards: Arab candidates and lists faced efforts to be excluded from the ballot while petitions to disqualify far-right parties led by National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich were rejected. Section 7A of Israel’s Basic Law on the Knesset is the statute used to challenge candidates, covering actions such as denying Israel’s character as a Jewish and democratic state, promoting racism, or supporting armed campaigns by hostile groups.
Ben-Gvir and Smotrich have drawn international criticism for rhetoric and policy proposals seen as hostile toward Palestinians; several countries imposed sanctions on the two ministers in 2025, citing repeated incitement in the occupied West Bank. Petitions seeking to bar their parties were dismissed by the elections committee, with the attorney general concluding there was insufficient legal basis to remove them from the ballot.
Observers including Palestinian rights groups and analysts such as Zaidon Alkinani of the Arab Perspectives Institute say the episode spotlights structural barriers and political dynamics that complicate Palestinian citizens’ attempts to gain representation in Israeli politics. The controversy comes amid heightened scrutiny of how electoral institutions and legal mechanisms are applied in the run-up to the October 27 vote.
Keep Reading

We see East Africa’s food crisis coming — why are we waiting to act?

Trump announces US will send $90 checks to 20 million seniors enrolled in Medicare

The blue-state model for education has failed, and the public has caught on
