Judge orders White House to immediately restore access to CNN, MS NOW, Politico
A federal judge ordered the White House early Thursday to immediately restore hard-press credentials for reporters from CNN, MS NOW and Politico, finding the outlets were likely deprived of constitutionally required procedural due process. U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued the temporary order after an emergency hearing and tied his reasoning to D.C. Circuit precedent dating to 1977 and to a similar 2018 case over Jim Acosta’s pass revocation.

Why It Matters
The ruling reaffirms that procedural due process protections apply when the White House revokes press credentials, potentially limiting the administration’s ability to bar news organizations without prior notice or a hearing. It also signals that prior circuit precedent and past litigation over credentials remain controlling legal authority in such disputes.
Key Facts
- Judge: U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly
- Order issued: Early Thursday (two-week temporary order)
- News organizations affected: CNN, MS NOW, Politico
- Action ordered: Immediate restoration of White House hard-press credentials
- Administration's justification: Cited national security concerns; letters sent after the denial of access to White House grounds on Saturday.
A federal judge ordered the White House to immediately reinstate hard-press credentials for reporters from CNN, MS NOW and Politico, concluding the outlets were likely denied their Fifth Amendment procedural due process rights. U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued the emergency ruling in the early hours of Thursday after holding a same-day hearing on the outlets’ lawsuit; the order is temporary and will remain in place for two weeks. The three organizations had been blocked from entering White House grounds on Saturday, and the administration later provided letters pointing to national security concerns. Kelly, a Trump appointee, noted the government did not contest that the outlets received no prior notice or opportunity for a hearing before their credentials were revoked. Kelly grounded his decision in D.C. Circuit precedent from 1977 that he said requires due process protections when the White House revokes press credentials, and he invoked the court’s 2018 ruling involving then-CNN reporter Jim Acosta as a parallel ruling. The judge wrote that, although the administration urged the court to overturn that precedent, he is bound to follow it. In court filings and argument the administration defended the bans by citing national security and pointing to specific stories published by the outlets. Kelly described those stories as routine and said he was skeptical that national security was the true motive, noting President Trump’s public statements about banning the outlets for what he characterized as untruthful and negative reporting. The president had predicted he would lose the order, called the judge unfair, and said he planned to appeal while also asserting a right to "clean out fake news."
Keep Reading

US Treasury secretary emerges as frontrunner for Trump’s AI czar role: Report

Chamber of Commerce, oil groups urge Trump to reject diesel export ban

Scaramucci: Leavitt would have told Trump not to ban media outlets

Farm state Republicans feel the pressure from rising diesel prices
Original source: The Hill