South Korea weighs crypto market makers after JPYC trades at 4 times peg
South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC) is evaluating whether to allow formal market-making activities in digital assets after a yen-pegged stablecoin, JPYC, briefly traded at roughly four times its intended value on the Upbit exchange. The watchdog cited that limited liquidity on the platform contributed to the price spike and said it will review mechanisms to improve market stability.

Why It Matters
If regulators create a carve-out for market makers, it could address chronic liquidity problems and price dislocations in South Korea's crypto markets that academics and industry researchers have previously flagged. Any change would also be a notable shift from the current Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which offers no exemption for market-making from market-manipulation rules.
Key Facts
- Incident: JPYC listed on Upbit on Sept. 17 and spiked from 12 KRW to a high of 37.6 KRW within an hour.
- Magnitude of spike: About four times the coin's market value.
- Reason given: The spike was attributed to limited liquidity on Upbit.
- Regulator involved: South Korea's Financial Services Commission (FSC).
- Official quoted: Yoo Young-joon, director of digital finance policy at the FSC.
South Korea's Financial Services Commission said it is reviewing whether to permit market-making activities in the country's digital asset markets after an episode this month in which a yen-linked stablecoin traded far above its peg on a major exchange. JPYC began trading on the Upbit platform on Sept. 17 and saw its price jump from 12 Korean won to 37.6 won within an hour, a move regulators and observers traced to thin liquidity on the exchange. At a conference in Seoul, FSC digital finance policy director Yoo Young-joon said the commission will examine whether measures such as formal market-making can bolster the efficiency and stability of the digital-asset landscape. Yoo also noted criticism that the JPYC listing resulted in user losses, and said there are growing calls for stronger discipline in listing and market-structure practices. Under the current Virtual Asset User Protection Act, there is no exemption from market-manipulation provisions for market-making, effectively preventing designated market makers from operating in crypto markets. Yoo's comments indicate the FSC may be reassessing that stance to allow limited or regulated market-making as a tool to address liquidity shortfalls. The debate over a market-maker carve-out is not new in South Korea. Academic papers and industry researchers have long argued that the absence of a formal market-making framework has contributed to liquidity problems, price disparities and heightened volatility — with the so-called Kimchi premium cited as an example of domestic market inefficiency. The FSC's consideration of market-making rules comes as lawmakers continue work on a broader Digital Asset Basic Act that would set rules for stablecoins, exchanges, disclosures and internal controls, though key details such as won-denominated stablecoin rules remain unresolved.
Keep Reading

Newsom signs California ban on public officials issuing memecoins

Vitalik Buterin says Hegotá could be Ethereum’s last ‘normal’ fork

Solana ETFs draw record $188 million in a week as Bitwise takes two-thirds of inflows
