The SEC Is finally modernizing transfer-agent rules. Wall Street must not repeat the ‘paperwork crisis’
On Sept. 1 the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed its first substantive update to transfer-agent rules since the late 1970s, explicitly acknowledging transfer agents’ use of blockchain technology for securities recordkeeping. Joris Delanoue of Fairmint argues the SEC’s approach should integrate onchain native registers into existing Section 17A frameworks to avoid recreating a modern 'Paperwork Crisis' where ownership records are fragmented across multiple ledgers.

Why It Matters
The proposal is a key step in adapting longstanding securities infrastructure to tokenization and digital records; how the SEC frames reporting and operational requirements will influence whether tokenized equity becomes an integrated part of regulated markets or a parallel, fragmented system. Clear standards on native onchain registers, holder identification, and programmable compliance are necessary to prevent mismatches between token wrappers and official registers.
Key Facts
- SEC proposal date: Sept. 1, 2026
- First major update since: late 1970s
- Section referenced: Section 17A of the Exchange Act
- Author and affiliation: Joris Delanoue, Fairmint
- Fairmint registration: Fairmint registered as a transfer agent in 2023},{
On Sept. 1 the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission unveiled a proposal that would modernize transfer-agent rules, marking the agency’s first significant update to that regime since the late 1970s. The commission’s package acknowledges how transfer agents operate today and signals openness to the use of distributed ledger technology in connection with securities offerings and transfers, while stopping short of broadly endorsing tokenization. Delanoue warns that tokenization can recreate a familiar operational hazard if the industry does not converge on a single authoritative system of record. He cites the 1960s Paperwork Crisis — when fragmented paper-based recordkeeping and surging trade volumes produced crippling back-office backlogs and prompted the creation of the Depository Trust Company in 1973 — as a cautionary precedent. The lesson, he says, is that ownership must be anchored to one official register, not multiple parallel ledgers. Fairmint, which registered as a transfer agent in 2023, operates on the premise that the cap table should be the system of record and issues and administrates equity directly onchain. Delanoue contrasts this native-onchain model with approaches that merely wrap off-chain securities in tokens, which risk divergence between the token ledger and the transfer agent’s official register. To make onchain registers work at market scale, Delanoue urges the SEC and industry to address operational realities in the proposed rules. He recommends that Form TA-2 explicitly distinguish native onchain registers from wrapped models, that holder identification requirements evolve beyond physical street addresses to permit cryptographic credentials or digital IDs, and that rules on legend removals and compliance (including Rules 17ad-30 and 17ad-31) recognize well-designed programmable, pre-trade smart contract controls overseen by registered transfer agents. He also underscores that a public blockchain can serve as the official record while transfer agents remain necessary to map onchain assets to identifiable owners and enforce regulatory duties.
Keep Reading

Bitget hackers move $4 million into Zcash’s private pool, making funds harder to trace

Clock's ticking: UK's crypto regulatory application window opens with February deadline

Crypto Long & Short: What will the AI agents run on?

Open USD takes on Tether, Circle with a different stablecoin model that's 'building money'
Original source: CoinDesk