A stable Afghanistan post 9/11 is in US interests says former US diplomat

Former US diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad said Washington has a "principal interest" in ensuring Afghanistan does not become a base for groups hostile to the United States. Khalilzad, who served as US ambassador in Afghanistan shortly after 9/11, urged attention on countering Chinese and Russian influence in the country.

By AI NewsroomPublished about 1 hour agoUpdated about 1 hour ago0 views
A stable Afghanistan post 9/11 is in US interests says former US diplomat

Why It Matters

Khalilzad’s comments link US security concerns about terrorist safe havens with broader geopolitical competition, indicating that Washington sees stability in Afghanistan as relevant both to counterterrorism and to limiting China and Russia’s regional reach.

Key Facts

  • Person: Zalmay Khalilzad
  • Role: Former US diplomat; US ambassador in Afghanistan shortly after 9/11
  • US interest stated: Washington has a "principal interest" in preventing Afghanistan from becoming a hub for anti-US groups
  • Priority mentioned: Focus should be on countering China and Russia’s influence

Zalmay Khalilzad, a former US diplomat who served as the American ambassador to Afghanistan in the period shortly after the 9/11 attacks, warned that the United States has a vital stake in preventing Afghanistan from turning into a base for groups hostile to Washington. He framed this objective as a "principal interest" for US policy toward the country.

Khalilzad argued that preserving stability in Afghanistan should be driven by concerns about safe havens for anti-US actors. His remarks tie traditional counterterrorism priorities to the question of how Afghanistan is governed and whether it could serve as a staging ground for operations against American interests.

In addition to counterterrorism, Khalilzad said the US should pay attention to broader geopolitical competition, specifically pointing to the need to counter the influence of China and Russia in Afghanistan. That emphasis suggests he views Kabul as an arena where great-power rivalry intersects with security risks.

Taken together, his statements underscore a policy perspective that treats Afghanistan as important both for preventing the re-emergence of anti-US groups and for limiting strategic gains by other major powers in the region.

Keep Reading