ING: Supply-Side Risks Stay Elevated Even as Oil Prices Pull Back
ING Bank analysts warned that supply-side risks for crude oil remain high even after prices eased following smaller-than-expected disruptions to Saudi exports. Market sentiment softened when Saudi shipments through the Strait of Hormuz outpaced initial fears, but fresh outages elsewhere and geopolitical tensions have kept upside risks to supply intact.
Why It Matters
The persistence of supply threats — including recent disruptions in Libya and ongoing U.S.-Iran tensions — means oil markets could remain volatile despite recent price declines, with implications for energy markets and trading strategies. ING’s commentary highlights that improvements in one route or region do not eliminate broader global supply vulnerabilities.
Key Facts
- Source: OilPrice.com (reporting by Tsvetana Paraskova) and ING Bank analysts
- ING analysts: Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey
- Brent price move: Fell to $100 per barrel from $108 per barrel earlier last week
- Saudi pipeline action: Saudi Arabia shut down key pipeline that bypasses the Strait of Hormuz (early last week)
- Hormuz shipments: Higher-than-expected Saudi shipments through the Strait of Hormuz eased initial supply concerns (no specific volume given)
Analysts at ING Bank said on Tuesday that risks to oil supply remain elevated even after a recent pullback in crude prices. The market had reacted to what turned out to be a smaller disruption to Saudi exports than feared, which contributed to a fall in Brent crude from about $108 a barrel earlier last week to roughly $100 a barrel by Friday and Monday. ING’s commodities strategists, Warren Patterson and Ewa Manthey, noted that the market is balancing hopes for diplomatic progress against real, ongoing supply disruptions. Sentiment was also influenced by expectations around a UN General Assembly session and talk of potential U.S.-Iran diplomacy, which briefly weighed on prices before a subsequent uptick. Geopolitical escalation remained a factor: U.S. Treasury official Scott Bessent warned of measures to block Iranian airlines from refueling and selling tickets — remarks that represented part of an intensifying verbal campaign by the U.S. against Iran. At the same time, a fresh supply shock emerged in Libya where an armed group closed a valve on the pipeline linking the Sharara oilfield to the Zawiya export terminal. That action reduced output at Sharara to about 127,000 barrels per day from roughly 340,000 bpd prior to the shutdown. ING emphasized that such events — whether in the Middle East or North Africa — keep supply-side risk heightened. While increased Saudi shipments through the Strait of Hormuz have alleviated some immediate concerns, the bank’s strategists warned that the market remains vulnerable to further disruptions and geopolitical developments.
Keep Reading
Can the US ban Iranian airlines worldwide – and what would it mean?
Why the world should care about the far right’s rise in Germany
Palestine weekly: Violent disruptions from olive groves to Al-Aqsa Mosque
