Kalshi says CFTC hasn’t contacted it over ‘unusual’ $5B trading activity

Prediction markets operator Kalshi said the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has not contacted the firm and it does not believe a formal probe is underway after reports that the regulator was reviewing a surge of trading in its Ether perpetual futures market. The Wall Street Journal had reported a cluster of rapid trades of about $5,500 each that together represented more than $5 billion in volume over the past month, prompting allegations of wash trading.

By AI Newsroom· Reviewed by Pranav, Founder & Editor-in-ChiefPublished about 2 hours agoUpdated about 2 hours ago0 views
Kalshi says CFTC hasn’t contacted it over ‘unusual’ $5B trading activity

Why It Matters

The scrutiny involves a rapidly expanding new perpetual futures business and touches on industry concerns about market integrity and how liquidity incentives can affect reported volume. Regulatory attention or questions about trading practices could influence how firms design incentive programs and how regulators view emerging crypto derivatives markets.

Key Facts

  • Regulatory contact: Kalshi says it has not been contacted by the CFTC and does not believe a formal examination is under way.
  • Reporter: The Wall Street Journal reported the CFTC was reviewing the trading pattern.
  • Trade size: Individual trades clustered around $5,500 each.
  • Reported volume: Those trades accounted for over $5 billion in Ether perpetual futures volume over the past month, per the Journal.
  • Incentives disclosed: Kalshi said it runs liquidity incentive programs that pay market makers for posting orders of specified sizes and price ranges; it also reportedly waived fees and made monthly cash payments to encourage liquidity.

Kalshi, the operator of prediction markets, told Cointelegraph it has not been contacted by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and does not believe it is subject to a formal inquiry, responding after media reports that the regulator was examining unusual trading in the firm’s Ether perpetual futures market. The Wall Street Journal had said the CFTC was reviewing a pattern of rapid trades clustered near $5,500, a pattern that prompted allegations of wash trading.

The Journal reported that those roughly $5,500-sized trades contributed more than $5 billion in Ether perpetuals volume over the previous month. The coverage also said Kalshi offered some traders opportunities to acquire equity if they met trading-volume targets and that the company had waived trading fees and provided monthly cash payments to encourage large traders to supply liquidity.

Kalshi has attributed the repeated trade sizes to its liquidity incentive programs. In a blog post, the firm said it pays market makers to post buy and sell orders at predetermined sizes and price ranges, and that those payments compensate the presence of orders rather than the volume executed. The post did not directly address the Journal’s reporting about equity-purchase opportunities tied to trading targets.

Responding to claims of wash trading, Kalshi argued the activity reflected genuine market interaction between market makers and many distinct takers. The company said the fixed-size transactions are consistent with a single maker posting resting orders that numerous takers trade against, and noted that takers frequently realized profits while the maker often lost money—an outcome it said indicates real economic activity rather than artificially inflated volume.

Keep Reading