Leaked EU Draft Would Scrap Hydrogen Mandates for EU-Wide Target

A leaked European Commission impact assessment for the forthcoming Renewable Energy Directive (RED IV) indicates the Commission’s preferred approach would drop binding national renewable hydrogen mandates in favor of a single indicative EU-wide target and give greater latitude to crop-based and certain advanced biofuels. The draft sets an indicative renewable hydrogen consumption target of 8 million tonnes for industry and refineries and proposes a 7% EU ceiling for crop-based biofuels, among other measures.

By AI NewsroomPublished about 13 hours agoUpdated about 13 hours ago0 views

Why It Matters

If enacted, the changes would shift the balance between emissions-driven mandates and priorities such as energy security, cost and national flexibility, with potential consequences for where hydrogen production and biofuel supply develop in Europe. The draft also raises short-term policy uncertainty for hydrogen projects that rely on clear long-term demand signals to secure investment.

Key Facts

  • source-document: Leaked European Commission impact assessment working document for RED IV (Renewable Energy Directive) - reported by Rystad Energy
  • preferred-option: Replace binding national renewable hydrogen mandates with an indicative EU-wide renewable hydrogen consumption target
  • indicative-hydrogen-target: 8 million tonnes for industry and refineries (described in the draft as the 'average optimal level for the period covered by the policy')
  • current-RFNBO-transport-target: RFNBOs target of 1% in transport by 2030 under RED III
  • current-RFNBO-industry-shares: RFNBO shares of 42% in industry by 2030 and 60% by 2035 (under RED III)

A leaked European Commission impact assessment for RED IV signals a notable policy pivot on renewable fuels after 2030. The draft’s preferred package would remove binding national hydrogen mandates and instead set an indicative EU-level renewable hydrogen consumption target of 8 million tonnes aimed at industry and refineries. The document frames that figure as an “average optimal level” for the policy period and foresees hydrogen credits and downstream demand incentives that would need to be introduced via other legislation.

Under the current RED III framework, demand has been anchored by national obligations, including a 1% RFNBOs target in transport by 2030 and RFNBO shares of 42% for industry by 2030 and 60% by 2035. Rystad Energy’s base case projects total EU green hydrogen demand of about 9.5 million tonnes by 2040; industry observers have interpreted the 8 million-tonne figure in the draft as roughly equivalent to annual consumption by that year. Rystad’s hydrogen researcher Frederick Andre Wessel warns that removing binding national targets could add policy uncertainty at a time when projects need long-term demand clarity to reach final investment decisions, and that flexibility may concentrate production in lower-cost regions or risk fragmented, pocketed markets if demand signals remain strong only in a few member states.

On biofuels the draft moves in a more supportive direction, reflecting a heightened focus on energy security. It proposes a common 7% EU ceiling for crop-based biofuels, which the assessment says would raise eligible conventional biofuel volumes by about 30% compared with the 2020 basis used in the analysis. The draft would also give preferential treatment to advanced biofuels derived from EU-sourced feedstocks through multipliers, and tighter certification rules could curb some imported fuels and feedstocks—potentially improving the competitive position of domestic producers. The assessment notes the EU imported around 1.8 million tonnes of hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO) last year and that more than half of its sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) supply was imported.

Overall, the leaked draft points to divergent effects across renewable fuels: a possible loss of long-term binding demand certainty for hydrogen, but strengthened support for biofuels tied to European feedstocks. All measures in the working document remain subject to change before the Commission publishes its formal proposal, leaving key details about delivery mechanisms and legal implementation unresolved.

Keep Reading