Mike Waltz: US offered to sell Iran uranium for civilian programme

US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz said the United States offered to sell Iran uranium for a civilian nuclear programme during past negotiations, but Tehran rejected the proposal. Waltz framed the offer as similar to the US arrangements with the United Arab Emirates, which limit domestic enrichment and include international inspections.

By AI Newsroom· Reviewed by Pranav, Founder & Editor-in-ChiefPublished about 1 hour agoUpdated about 1 hour ago0 views
Mike Waltz: US offered to sell Iran uranium for civilian programme

Why It Matters

The claim highlights ongoing diplomatic efforts and disputes over Iran's nuclear fuel supply and inspections—central issues in efforts to prevent Tehran from acquiring weapons-capable material and to restore international monitoring. It also underscores tensions between US proposals and Iran’s stated refusal to transfer its enriched uranium abroad.

Key Facts

  • Who spoke: Mike Waltz, US Ambassador to the United Nations
  • Where said: NBC's Meet the Press
  • Offer described: US negotiators offered to sell uranium to Iran for a civilian programme
  • Comparison cited: Arrangement likened to US-UAE nuclear agreement of 2009
  • Iran's declared stockpile: Estimated more than 440kg of uranium enriched to 60% purity (source in article)

US Ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz told NBC’s Meet the Press that the United States had proposed selling uranium to Iran for use in a civilian nuclear programme during earlier negotiations aimed at resolving the conflict. Waltz said Washington was prepared to structure such an arrangement in a way similar to the 2009 US-UAE agreement, under which the UAE agreed not to enrich uranium domestically or reprocess spent fuel and accepted international inspections. Waltz said the Trump administration was open to allowing Iran to maintain a civilian nuclear programme provided Tehran met obligations under international law and the Nuclear Non‑Proliferation Treaty (NPT). He added that options discussed included measures to prevent Iran from possessing or reconstructing highly enriched uranium, and even having Tehran transfer existing weapons-capable material out of the country. The longer dispute centers on what should be done with Iran’s current enriched uranium and how to ensure future supplies cannot be diverted to weapons use. The article cites an estimate that Iran has more than 440kg of uranium enriched to about 60% purity; by comparison, uranium enriched to roughly 90% is suitable for a nuclear weapon. Under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Iran had agreed to cap enrichment at 3.67% under strict inspection, but the Trump administration withdrew from that deal in 2018. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has expressed concern about Iran’s “continued noncompliance” with NPT safeguards, and the agency said on September 10 that it has lacked access to key Iranian nuclear sites since June 2025 after attacks by Israel and the US. Iranian officials have rejected the IAEA finding as politically influenced and said they would not allow inspections until facilities could be made safe from military strikes. Against this background, Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi told Meet the Press he remains engaged in diplomacy but said Iran is prepared for war to resume if necessary.

Keep Reading