New York sues Polymarket, alleging it is running an illegal gambling operation
New York Attorney General Letitia James and Governor Kathy Hochul sued QCX LLC, which operates as Polymarket US, alleging the prediction-market platform runs an unlicensed gambling operation in the state. The complaint asks a court to bar Polymarket from offering services in New York, to recover alleged illegal gains, and to impose fines and restitution.

Why It Matters
The case is part of a broader legal dispute over whether event-based contracts on prediction markets are governed by federal financial regulators or by state gambling laws, a question with major regulatory and commercial implications for the fast-evolving prediction market sector.
Key Facts
- Defendant: QCX LLC (doing business as Polymarket US)
- Plaintiffs: New York Attorney General Letitia James and Governor Kathy Hochul
- Allegation: Operating an unlicensed gambling business in New York
- Relief sought: Court order to stop operating in New York, restitution to customers, forfeiture of alleged illegal gains, and fines equal to three times those gains
- U.S. platform launch: Polymarket launched its U.S. platform in December 2025 with markets allowing wagers on sporting events.
New York’s attorney general and governor filed suit against Polymarket’s U.S. unit, QCX LLC, alleging the prediction market is functioning as an unlicensed gambling operation within the state. The complaint asks a court to prohibit Polymarket from operating in New York without a gambling license, to force the company to return alleged illegal profits to consumers, and to impose fines equal to three times those gains. The state’s filing contends that Polymarket’s contracts — which let users stake money on outcomes with uncertain results — constitute gambling under New York law. The suit also alleges the platform permitted users aged 18 to 20 to participate, while New York’s mobile sports betting rules require participants to be at least 21. Polymarket re-entered the U.S. market less than a year before the suit, rolling out markets that initially focused on sporting events and signaling plans to expand into other event types. A company spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the litigation. The case joins a string of disputes between state regulators and prediction-market firms about whether those platforms are regulated by federal authorities — chiefly the Commodity Futures Trading Commission — or by state gambling statutes. New York previously sued rival Kalshi in July after talks with state officials broke down, seeking as much as $36 billion in penalties and disgorgement; that matter and other state cases have proceeded through appeals, and a related Kalshi-New Jersey case has reached the U.S. Supreme Court.
Keep Reading

Bullish, Alpaca and Apex Fintech form coalition to push issuer-backed tokenized stocks

Bitget Hacked as $350 Million Vanishes From Crypto Exchange Wallets

Federal Reserve Unveils Stablecoin Rules on Reserves and Capital
