Onchain Perps Close Execution Gap With CEXs, Castle Labs Says
A Castle Labs analysis of live order books found that Hyperliquid's onchain perpetuals platform held as much resting liquidity as the median of major centralized exchanges (Binance, Bybit and OKX) for four out of five crypto assets, and executed trades at lower cost. The remaining differences between onchain and centralized venues were driven primarily by how each prices products tied to stocks and commodities when those underlying markets are closed.
Why It Matters
This suggests onchain derivatives venues can approach centralized exchanges on liquidity and execution costs for many crypto assets, narrowing a key competitive gap. However, pricing behavior for assets linked to off-chain markets remains a structural difference that still favors some centralized venues.
Key Facts
- Study author: Castle Labs
- Method: Analysis of live order books
- Platform compared: Hyperliquid
- Centralized exchanges used for comparison: Binance, Bybit, OKX
- Assets where Hyperliquid matched median liquidity: 4 of 5 crypto assets
Castle Labs examined live order books to compare execution characteristics across trading venues and reported that Hyperliquid, an onchain perpetuals platform, provided as much resting liquidity as the median of three major centralized exchanges — Binance, Bybit and OKX — for four out of five crypto assets included in the study. The analysis also found that trading on Hyperliquid cost less for those assets than on the centralized platforms sampled.
The report identifies the principal remaining divergence between onchain and centralized venues as how each prices contracts tied to stocks and commodities when the underlying markets are not open. That discrepancy in off-hours pricing practices is where the bulk of the execution gap persists, according to Castle Labs.
By focusing on live order-book data, the study aimed to measure practical trading conditions such as available resting liquidity and immediate execution costs rather than theoretical liquidity metrics. Castle Labs' findings indicate that for many crypto-native instruments, onchain perpetuals can now offer liquidity and cost characteristics comparable to established centralized exchanges.
The study implies that structural differences in how venues handle assets dependent on external markets continue to differentiate venue behavior, particularly outside regular trading hours for those underlying markets. Castle Labs' work highlights both the progress of onchain derivatives in matching centralized offerings for many crypto assets and the remaining areas where centralized venues retain an advantage.
Keep Reading

Authors Pull Ethereum Staking Reward Burn From Hegotá

NEAR Intents Halts Services, Reports $3.8 Million Loss
