Trump: US-Iran meeting at UN was ‘very good’
US President Donald Trump said he held a three-hour meeting with Iranian officials at the United Nations, calling the session "very good." He portrayed the situation as a pivotal choice for Iran between "potential greatness" and "obliteration," while US and Iranian officials reportedly continue to explore a possible deal to end the months-long conflict.
Why It Matters
A direct, prolonged meeting between the US president and Iranian officials signals a possible diplomatic opening in a protracted confrontation; any agreement or framework emerging from such talks could have regional and international security implications. Public framing of the options for Iran by the US president underscores the high stakes being communicated to Tehran during negotiations.
Key Facts
- Who: US President Donald Trump and Iranian officials
- Location: United Nations (UN) meeting
- Duration: Three hours
- President's description of meeting: "Very good"
- Choice described to Iran: "Potential greatness" or "obliteration" (quote from Trump)
US President Donald Trump said he held a three-hour meeting with Iranian officials on the sidelines of the United Nations, describing the session as "very good." The comments came as representatives from the White House and Tehran were reported to be exploring whether a deal could be reached to end a months-long conflict. Trump framed the moment as a consequential one for Iran, saying the country faced a choice between "potential greatness" and "obliteration." He did not provide additional public details in the excerpt about the meeting's participants, the proposals discussed, or any timeline for further talks. The reported outreach follows an extended period of confrontation, and the meeting at the UN represents a rare face-to-face engagement at the highest level. Both sides' willingness to discuss a possible settlement could mark an important step in diplomatic efforts, though the outcome and specific terms — if any — were not described in the provided text. Officials from the White House and Tehran were characterized as exploring options to end the conflict, but the excerpt does not include confirmation of formal negotiations, agreements, or next steps. Further reporting would be needed to clarify what, if any, concrete progress resulted from the three-hour discussion.
Keep Reading
Erdogan accuses Israel of ‘genocidal mindset’ at UNGA
What led to the 1994 Tutsi Genocide in Rwanda
Qatar denounces Israeli aggression across the region
