UEFA wants FIFA subsidiaries’ blocked from Infantino discovery fight in US
UEFA asked a Manhattan federal court to block FIFA’s U.S. subsidiaries from intervening in its effort to obtain evidence under a U.S. discovery law tied to a potential Swiss criminal case involving FIFA President Gianni Infantino. The European governing body says FIFA (Americas) Inc and FWC2026 US Inc are improperly attempting to act in place of their Swiss parent and would only delay the proceedings.

Why It Matters
The court’s decision will affect whether UEFA can access documents and testimony it says are relevant to a possible Swiss probe and could shape the factual record ahead of Infantino’s bid for a fourth presidential term at FIFA. It also tests how U.S. discovery tools interact with international sports-federation disputes.
Key Facts
- Court and filing: Manhattan federal court; UEFA filed its response late on Thursday.
- Subsidiaries seeking to intervene: FIFA (Americas) Inc and FWC2026 US Inc.
- Target of UEFA’s discovery request: Thrive Capital Management and founder Joshua Kushner.
- Subject of inquiry: Proposed FIFA Forward Enterprise transaction, a plan Infantino withdrew on August 1.
- UEFA’s possible legal step: Considering a criminal complaint in Switzerland alleging criminal mismanagement by Gianni Infantino and potentially other FIFA officials.
UEFA has asked a U.S. court to reject motions by two FIFA-linked American companies to join its bid for discovery under Section 1782 of the U.S. code. In a filing submitted in Manhattan, the European governing body argued FIFA (Americas) Inc and FWC2026 US Inc are improperly attempting to act as proxies for FIFA and its president, Gianni Infantino — neither of whom have sought to participate in the proceedings. The discovery request targets Thrive Capital Management and its founder Joshua Kushner, whom UEFA says may possess information about a proposed commercial transaction called the FIFA Forward Enterprise. That plan, which would have sold a permanent stake in commercial and operational rights tied to the World Cup and other FIFA events, was withdrawn by Infantino on August 1 after criticism from football bodies and other observers. UEFA told the court the U.S. subsidiaries lack a direct legal interest in the matter because they are not targets of the contemplated Swiss investigation and are not expected recipients of the subpoenas UEFA seeks. The body also argued that confidentiality concerns the subsidiaries raise would more properly belong to FIFA in Switzerland, and noted that Thrive and Kushner already have counsel who can challenge any subpoenas after they are served. FIFA has accused UEFA of a smear campaign and described the discovery effort as a fishing expedition aimed at damaging the organisation and its leadership; FIFA and Infantino said they did not immediately respond to requests for comment and Infantino has denied wrongdoing. UEFA warned that allowing the subsidiaries to intervene now would depart from the standard Section 1782 practice — typically granting discovery first and letting any recipient challenge it later — and would add an extra round of briefing that could delay resolution. The court has not yet ruled on either UEFA’s discovery application or the subsidiaries’ motion to intervene, and Infantino is due to stand for a fourth term in FIFA’s presidential election in March.
Keep Reading

From hours at security to bulletproof cockpits: How 9/11 changed air travel

Hong Kong court hands stiff jail sentences to Tiananmen vigil activists
