OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs call for global AI regulation at UN

Chief executives from leading AI firms, including OpenAI and Anthropic, told the United Nations Security Council that global oversight is urgently needed to prevent AI from posing existential risks. The session, convened by France during the UN General Assembly, saw tech leaders and UN experts call for multilateral frameworks even as the United States and China resist immediate broad restrictions.

By AI Newsroom· Reviewed by Pranav, Founder & Editor-in-ChiefPublished about 2 hours agoUpdated about 2 hours ago0 views
OpenAI, Anthropic CEOs call for global AI regulation at UN

Why It Matters

The appeals bring industry voices directly to a global security forum, highlighting a push for international rules at the same time the largest AI-producing nations are reluctant to cede regulatory control—raising questions about whether coordinated governance can keep pace with rapid AI development.

Key Facts

  • Forum: United Nations Security Council meeting convened by France during the UN General Assembly
  • Participants: Sam Altman (OpenAI), Dario Amodei (Anthropic), Clement Delangue (Hugging Face), Yoshua Bengio (Independent International Scientific Panel co-chair), UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres quoted
  • UN body size: 15-member Security Council
  • US position: Michael Kratsios, US representative, said the US rejects international bodies asserting centralized global governance of AI
  • Hugging Face incident: Hugging Face said it was attacked by AI and used a Chinese AI model to assist its defence because of fewer restrictions on that tool compared with US alternatives

Leaders of prominent AI companies urged the United Nations Security Council to establish international oversight for artificial intelligence, warning that the technology could pose risks to humanity if managed poorly. Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, told council members that AI could become an existential threat, and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman warned of the possibility that humanity could lose control over AI’s future. The meeting, organized by France to coincide with the UN General Assembly in New York, drew voices from industry and the scientific community calling for democratic and government-led decisions about AI governance rather than leaving major choices to a handful of research labs. Several council representatives, including foreign ministers from France and the United Kingdom, backed the need for common international frameworks to steer development and use of the technology. Speakers also recounted recent incidents used to justify tighter safety measures. Clement Delangue, CEO of Hugging Face, told the council that his company had been attacked by AI and had relied on a Chinese AI model—which had fewer restrictions than comparable US tools—to help defend against the incident. Experts at the meeting, including Yoshua Bengio, described the dangers as real and transnational, arguing that no single country can address them alone. Despite the calls for multilateral rules, major powers signalled reluctance to accept sweeping external constraints. The United States’ representative, Michael Kratsios, explicitly rejected efforts by international bodies to assert centralized global governance of AI. Observers noted the broader context of a technological rivalry between the US and China, which complicates prospects for rapid, binding international limits. The UN has already taken steps in recent years—passing a nonbinding 2024 resolution on AI and creating two new bodies to assess and discuss AI governance—but participants at the council said more international cooperation will be needed as adoption accelerates.

Keep Reading